Side-by-side
| Dimension | ATSHack | Enhancv |
|---|---|---|
| Cheapest paid | $1 / resume | ~$19.99/month |
| Model | Tailor existing resume, ATS-plain | Design-forward builder |
| Free tier | Free 0–100 grader, no account | Free ATS checker, trial |
| Account required | No (for $1 path) | Yes |
| Layout | Single-column, ATS-safe | Multi-column, designed templates |
| Best for | Passing ATS on each application | A polished-looking resume |
Design vs ATS-safe formatting
Here is the tension: many of Enhancv's most attractive templates use columns, sidebars, and graphics, the exact elements that can confuse an ATS parser. They look great to a human and can score worse with the software that screens you first. ATSHack deliberately outputs a plain, single-column layout with standard headers, because that is what parses cleanly. If a recruiter will read your resume directly through a referral, Enhancv's design can help; if it goes through an ATS, plain wins.
Pricing: per-resume vs monthly
Enhancv runs about $19.99/month, less if you commit semi-annually, after a trial. ATSHack is $1 per tailored resume with no subscription on the no-account path. For a short, focused job search, paying per resume is cheaper than a monthly builder subscription.
Tailoring per posting
Enhancv's free ATS checker flags issues, but you still edit the resume yourself in its builder. ATSHack rewrites your existing resume to match each specific posting and returns the file, which is the part that actually moves your match score.
FAQ
Bottom line
Enhancv is great if your priority is a polished, distinctive-looking resume that humans will read. If your priority is passing the ATS on each application without a subscription, ATSHack's plain, tailored output for $1 is the safer, cheaper fit. More options in the best Jobscan alternatives.
More comparisons
Best Jobscan alternatives ATSHack vs Jobscan ATSHack vs Teal ATSHack vs Resume Worded ATSHack vs Rezi ATSHack vs SkillSyncer ATSHack vs Kickresume ATSHack vs Zety